From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-84939-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 29558 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2011 16:27:23 -0000
Received: (qmail 29547 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Nov 2011 16:27:22 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 16:27:08 +0000
Received: from nat-jpt.mentorg.com ([192.94.33.2] helo=PR1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com)	by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp 	id 1RMMbj-0003cc-Pm from Yao_Qi@mentor.com ; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 09:27:07 -0700
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([172.16.63.104]) by PR1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);	 Sat, 5 Nov 2011 01:27:06 +0900
Message-ID: <4EB41270.10207@codesourcery.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 16:27:00 -0000
From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110930 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm reversible : <phase_2_complete>
References: <998639.46560.qm@web112516.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <m3fwnusq4e.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <321260.58442.qm@web112504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <m3hb6rfc5j.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <1316327455.23344.YahooMailNeo@web112509.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <1316404058.27177.YahooMailNeo@web112502.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <m3pqhzcowx.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <1318650316.91503.YahooMailNeo@web112508.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4E9952EA.5040805@codesourcery.com> <m3pqh9rv2u.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <m3pqh9rv2u.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00116.txt.bz2

On 11/04/2011 01:10 AM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Yao" == Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com> writes:
> 
> Yao> I noticed that test cases in gdb.reverse are *not* enabled in default.
> 
> Do you know why that is?  It seems to me that they should be enabled on
> platforms where they are known to work.  The current situation means
> that any regressions are probably completely missed.
> 

I don't know why, looks these cases are written in that way at the
beginning.

I have a sed script to convert "target_info exists gdb,use_precord" to a
proc "support_process_record" which returns true on x86-linux and
x86_64-linux.  There are some fails running these tests in gdb.reverse
on x86-linux, IMO, we don't have to KFAIL them, because these fails are
unknown to us.  I'll send out this patch later.

-- 
Yao (齐尧)