From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31023 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2011 10:26:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 30999 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Oct 2011 10:26:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (HELO ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net) (150.101.137.143) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 10:25:47 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ar4BALbpo0520iBh/2dsb2JhbAAMN6cKhHcEAQEBAQN0BAEQCxgJFg8JAwIBAgFFBg0BBwEBhUSCMLJyiEAEpXc Received: from ppp118-210-32-97.lns20.adl2.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.1]) ([118.210.32.97]) by ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 23 Oct 2011 20:55:46 +1030 Message-ID: <4EA3EBA9.1050204@toojays.net> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 18:29:00 -0000 From: John Steele Scott User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110922 Thunderbird/3.1.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Kratochvil CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, tromey@redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] PR symtab/13277: Resolving opaque structures in ICC generated binaries. References: <4E9A6F3C.6010400@toojays.net> <20111019084011.GA9326@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20111019090108.GA11862@host1.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: <20111019090108.GA11862@host1.jankratochvil.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00616.txt.bz2 On 19/10/11 19:31, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:40:11 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: >> OK with those changes. > > I guess this change is not "legally significant" as you do not have completed > FSF copyright assignment. I can check it in upon your reply. I emailed Tom Tromey off-list about papers last week, but haven't heard back yet. I'd like to find the time to add test cases for this at some stage, so it would probably be a good idea to start on the paperwork stuff. cheers, John