From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23622 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2011 01:56:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 23563 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Oct 2011 01:56:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:56:26 +0000 Received: from nat-jpt.mentorg.com ([192.94.33.2] helo=PR1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1RFcRF-0002rq-LS from Yao_Qi@mentor.com ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 18:56:25 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([172.16.63.104]) by PR1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:56:21 +0900 Message-ID: <4E9B8B08.9060509@codesourcery.com> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 03:18:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110923 Thunderbird/7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: oza Pawandeep CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm reversible : References: <998639.46560.qm@web112516.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <321260.58442.qm@web112504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <1316327455.23344.YahooMailNeo@web112509.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <1316404058.27177.YahooMailNeo@web112502.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <1318650316.91503.YahooMailNeo@web112508.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4E9952EA.5040805@codesourcery.com> <4E998B76.8020803@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00452.txt.bz2 On 10/16/2011 12:34 AM, oza Pawandeep wrote: > Hi Yao, > > first of all thank you for your comments, will be sending the patch > soon with your comments incorporated as much as possible. > thank you again for sending test results; > > I suppose failed test case might be including > > 1) system call support > 2) signal support > 3) any other linux ABI support > 4) there are some programs on x86 assembly which needs to be written > for ARM and put separately. x86 assembly will not compiled and run for arm target, so they don't make fails here. Beside these fails, I find there are some GDB internal errors in test result: stepi^M ../../gdb/gdb/breakpoint.c:12523: internal-error: insert_single_step_breakpoint: Assertion `single_step_breakpoints[1] == NULL' failed. stepi^M ../../gdb/gdb/infrun.c:1804: internal-error: resume: Assertion `!(singlestep_breakpoints_inserted_p && step)' failed. -- Yao (齐尧)