From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1707 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2011 13:33:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 1693 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Oct 2011 13:33:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:33:28 +0000 Received: from nat-jpt.mentorg.com ([192.94.33.2] helo=PR1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1RF4Mh-00019r-UN from Yao_Qi@mentor.com for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 06:33:28 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([172.16.63.104]) by PR1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 15 Oct 2011 22:33:25 +0900 Message-ID: <4E998B76.8020803@codesourcery.com> Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:33:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110923 Thunderbird/7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm reversible : References: <998639.46560.qm@web112516.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <321260.58442.qm@web112504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <1316327455.23344.YahooMailNeo@web112509.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <1316404058.27177.YahooMailNeo@web112502.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <1318650316.91503.YahooMailNeo@web112508.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4E9952EA.5040805@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <4E9952EA.5040805@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00435.txt.bz2 On 10/15/2011 05:31 PM, Yao Qi wrote: > I noticed that test cases in gdb.reverse are *not* enabled in default. > You need to add the following two lines in your board file to turn them on, > > set_board_info gdb,use_precord 1 > set_board_info gdb,can_reverse 1 > > It is good if you can post the test result in gdb.reverse so that we are > more confidient to your patch. ^^^^^^^^^^ typo "confident". I run test cases in gdb.reverse with my own board file [1], and get following result on x86: === gdb Summary === # of expected passes 2774 # of unexpected failures 22 I also applied your patch, and run gdb.reverse test cases on arm natively: === gdb Summary === # of expected passes 1180 # of unexpected failures 1090 # of expected failures 142 I don't think these fails are all related to your arm-reverse patch. IMO, it means there are still some work to do, not only in arm bits, but also in gdb general parts and test cases. Sorry that I can't give any useful suggestion here. -- Yao (齐尧) [1] My board file reverse.exp load_generic_config "unix" process_multilib_options "" # The default compiler for this target. set_board_info compiler "[find_gcc]" set_board_info gdb,can_reverse 1 set_board_info gdb,use_precord 1