From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18757 invoked by alias); 4 Oct 2011 17:59:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 18749 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Oct 2011 17:59:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from qnx.com (HELO hub3.qnx.com) (209.226.137.86) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:59:03 +0000 Received: by hub3.qnx.com (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 9B0EA6C51B5; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:59:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from EXHTS1.ott.qnx.com (unknown [10.222.2.110]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub3.qnx.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4CE06C51AE; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:59:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [10.42.107.93] (10.42.107.93) by qnx.com (10.222.2.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:58:03 -0400 Message-ID: <4E8B495B.6050705@qnx.com> Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:59:00 -0000 From: Aleksandar Ristovski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110923 Thunderbird/7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Tromey CC: Subject: Re: patch: solib_break from _r_debug.r_brk References: <4E847A11.6080800@redhat.com> <4E8A1D11.3070006@qnx.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00106.txt.bz2 On 11-10-04 12:58 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Aleksandar" == Aleksandar Ristovski writes: > > Aleksandar> Tom, thanks for looking into this, but I have meanwhile done > Aleksandar> further testing on gnu/linux and uncovered that it is not > Aleksandar> worth pursuing. While it works for us, it doesn't on > Aleksandar> gnu/linux and I am not sure it can be made generic enough to > Aleksandar> defend it: > Aleksandar> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-10/msg00043.html > > Aleksandar> Sorry about that. > > No problem. Somehow I didn't see that message. > > I think we can always make things work. E.g., we could make this > OS-dependent, say via gdbarch. Whether you want to take the time is > really up to you. > > Tom I plan to revisit it. Thanks for the gdbarch suggestion. --- Aleksandar