From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] Displaced stepping across fork/vfork : test case
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E708B7E.3040701@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201109121559.03294.pedro@codesourcery.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6204 bytes --]
On 09/12/2011 10:59 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Sunday 11 September 2011 01:55:00, Yao Qi wrote:
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/disp-step-fork.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
>> +
>> +#include<stdlib.h>
>> +int
>
> Newline between #include and int, please.
>
Fixed.
>> +
>> +if { ![support_displaced_stepping] } {
>> + unsupported "displaced stepping"
>> + return -1
>> +}
>> +
>> +global srcfile
>
> Did you mean to do:
>
> set srcfile ${testfile}.c
>
> and use $srcfile below instead? Otherwise, this var looks write-only.
>
This line is copied from other test case. It is not needed. Removed.
>> +set testfile "disp-step-fork"
>> +
>> +if [prepare_for_testing ${testfile}.exp ${testfile} ${testfile}.c {debug}] {
>> + untested ${testfile}.exp
>> + return -1
>> +}
>> +
>> +set syscall_insn ""
>> +
>> +# Define the syscall instruction for each target.
>> +
>> +if { [istarget "i\[34567\]86-*-linux*"] } {
>> + set syscall_insn "int"
>> +} elseif { [istarget "x86_64-*-linux*"] } {
>> + set syscall_insn "syscall"
>> +} else {
>> + return -1
>> +}
>
> You could do this before trying to compile the program. I'll
> be cheaper on !x86-linux targets.
>
OK.
> Very recent kernels will allow choosing the syscall instruction
> in the vsyscall page. It'll be better to make the test
> skip on !x86-linux at the top, and then, change the test
> to look for all alternatives of the syscall insn.
>
I read some pages on vsyscall, and thought we can fetch the value of
AT_SYSINFO in auxv to get the address of __kernel_vsyscall. However,
another simpler way comes up in my mind is to set possible syscall insn
to $syscall_insn like this,
set syscall_insn "(int|syscall|sysenter)"
If we match either of them in instruction stream, we are sure program
will enter to syscall, so we don't have to worry about vsyscall page.
>> +
>> +if { ![runto main] } then {
>> + fail "run to main ($teststr)"
>
> teststr doesn't exist in this test. Looks like a pasto.
>
Sorry. Removed $teststr.
>> +
>> +# Single step until we see sysall insn.
>> +while { $see_syscall_insn == 0 } {
>> + send_gdb "stepi\n"
>> + gdb_expect {
>> + -re ".*$syscall_insn.*$gdb_prompt $" {
>> + set see_syscall_insn 1
>> + }
>> + -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" {}
>> + }
>> +}
>
> Best put an upper cap on number of steps. Do you need to
> step through PLT resolution within the dynamic linker
> this way? That'll be a bunch more steps than required.
> You can work around it by instead letting the program
> call fork once (so the plt resolves), and then do this
> stepping dance on the second fork call.
The upper bound of steps is added in loop.
We don't need to step through PLT resolution. Now, each syscall
function is called three times. For the first time, it is for PLT
resolution, for the second time, it is for locating the address of
syscall insn, for the third time, single-step over syscall insn.
>
>> +
>> +set syscall_insn_addr ""
>> +set test "extract syscall insn address"
>> +
>> +send_gdb "print \$pc\n"
>> +gdb_expect {
>
> gdb_test_multiple, please. Or better still, just do:
>
> set pc [get_hexadecimal_valueof "\$pc" "0"]
>
Oh, get_hexadecimal_valueof is better. I am not aware of it before.
>> +
>> +set syscall_insn_next_addr ""
>> +set test "extract syscall insn address"
>> +
>> +send_gdb "stepi\n"
>> +gdb_expect {
>> + -re "0x\[0-9a-fA-F\]+ in .*$gdb_prompt $" {
>> + if [regexp "0x\[0-9a-fA-F\]+" $expect_out(0,string) syscall_insn_next_addr] {
>> + pass "$test"
>> + } else {
>> + fail "$test"
>> + }
>> + }
>> +}
>
> Does this work instead?
>
> gdb_test "stepi" "" "stepi over fork syscall"
> set syscall_insn_next_addr [get_hexadecimal_valueof "\$pc" "0"]
>
Yes, fixed like this.
>> +
>> +gdb_test "continue" "Continuing\\..*Breakpoint \[0-9\]+, .* in fork ().*" \
>> + "continue to fork (2nd time)"
>> +
>> +# Hit the breakpoint on fork for the second time. In this time, we'll set breakpoint
>> +# on the syscall insn we recorded previously, and single step over it.
>> +
>> +gdb_test "break \*$syscall_insn_addr" "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+ at.*" \
>> + "break on syscall insn"
>> +
>> +gdb_test "continue" "Continuing\\..*Breakpoint \[0-9\]+, .*" \
>> + "continue to syscall insn"
>> +
>> +gdb_test_no_output "set displaced-stepping on"
>> +# Check the address of next instruction of syscall.
>> +gdb_test "stepi" ".*$syscall_insn_next_addr.*" "single step over fork"
>> \ No newline at end of file
>
> Please add one.
>
Added a new line.
>> +
>> +gdb_test "break marker" "Breakpoint.*at.* file .*${testfile}.c, line.*"
>> +
>> +set syscall_insn_line ""
>> +set syscall_insn_addr ""
>> +
>> +# Disassemble vfork to extract the address of syscall instruction.
>> +gdb_test_multiple "disassemble vfork" "disassemble vfork" {
>> + -re "Dump of assembler code for function vfork.*$gdb_prompt $" {
>> + pass "disassemble vfork"
>> + if [regexp "0x\[0-9a-fA-F\]+\[ \t\]<\\+\[0-9\]+>:\[ \t\]$syscall_insn" $expect_out(0,string) syscall_insn_line] {
>> + pass "find syscall insn address"
>> +
>> + regexp "0x\[0-9a-fA-F\]+" $syscall_insn_line syscall_insn_addr
>> + } else {
>> + fail "find syscall insn address"
>> + return -1
>> + }
>> + }
>> + -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" {
>> + fail "disassemble vfork"
>> + return -1
>> + }
>> +}
>
> Why can you do a disassemble here, while you did the stepi thing
> for fork? The comments to the fork tests apply equally to this
> file. Just a suggestion, not use it'd be better: would it be possible to
> merge the .exp files, by putting the tests under a proc/function that
> takes fork/vfork and .c file to build as arg?
>
The reason I choose disassembly here is that disassembly is cheaper than
multiple stepi to locate the address of syscall insn.
In this version, there is only one .exp file, which is
disp-step-syscall.exp, and common test logic is moved to a single proc.
b.t.w, the test to TARGET_WAITKIND_EXECD event can be added into
disp-step-syscall.exp easily, but that is the work in next step.
--
Yao (é½å°§)
[-- Attachment #2: 0015-disp-step-fork-testcase.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 8258 bytes --]
gdb/testsuite/
* gdb.base/disp-step-fork.c: New.
* gdb.base/disp-step-syscall.exp: New.
* gdb.base/disp-step-vfork.c: New.
---
gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/disp-step-fork.c | 57 +++++++++++
gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/disp-step-syscall.exp | 131 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/disp-step-vfork.c | 75 +++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 263 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/disp-step-fork.c
create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/disp-step-syscall.exp
create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/disp-step-vfork.c
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/disp-step-fork.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/disp-step-fork.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ab4f3b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/disp-step-fork.c
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+/* This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
+
+ Copyright 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+ This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+ (at your option) any later version.
+
+ This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+ You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
+
+#include <stdlib.h>
+
+static void
+marker () {}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+ int pid;
+
+ pid = fork ();
+ if (pid == 0) /* child */
+ {
+ exit (0); /* at exit */
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ }
+
+ pid = fork ();
+ if (pid == 0) /* child */
+ {
+ exit (0); /* at exit */
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ }
+
+ pid = fork ();
+ if (pid == 0) /* child */
+ {
+ exit (0); /* at exit */
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ }
+
+ marker ();
+
+}
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/disp-step-syscall.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/disp-step-syscall.exp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5fa10c1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/disp-step-syscall.exp
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+# This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
+
+# Copyright 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+# (at your option) any later version.
+#
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+# GNU General Public License for more details.
+#
+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+
+if { ![support_displaced_stepping] } {
+ unsupported "displaced stepping"
+ return -1
+}
+
+
+
+set syscall_insn ""
+
+# Define the syscall instruction for each target.
+
+if { [istarget "i\[34567\]86-*-linux*"] || [istarget "x86_64-*-linux*"] } {
+ set syscall_insn "(int|syscall|sysenter)"
+} else {
+ return -1
+}
+
+proc disp_step_cross_syscall { syscall } {
+ global syscall_insn
+ global gdb_prompt
+
+ set testfile "disp-step-$syscall"
+
+ if [prepare_for_testing ${testfile}.exp ${testfile} ${testfile}.c {debug}] {
+ untested ${testfile}.exp
+ return -1
+ }
+
+ if { ![runto main] } then {
+ fail "run to main ($syscall)"
+ return
+ }
+ # Delete the breakpoint on main.
+ gdb_test_no_output "delete break 1"
+
+ gdb_test "break marker" "Breakpoint.*at.* file .*${testfile}.c, line.*"
+ gdb_test_no_output "set displaced-stepping off"
+
+ set syscall_bp 0
+ gdb_test_multiple "break $syscall" "break $syscall" {
+ -re "Breakpoint (\[0-9\]*) at .*$gdb_prompt $" {
+ set syscall_bp $expect_out(1,string)
+ pass "break $syscall"
+ }
+ }
+
+ gdb_test "continue" "Continuing\\..*Breakpoint \[0-9\]+, .* in $syscall ().*" \
+ "continue to $syscall (1st time)"
+ # Hit the breakpoint on $syscall for the first time. In this time, we will let PLT
+ # resolution done, and the number single steps we will do later will be
+ # reduced.
+
+ gdb_test "continue" "Continuing\\..*Breakpoint \[0-9\]+, .* in $syscall ().*" \
+ "continue to $syscall (2nd time)"
+ # Hit the breakpoint on $syscall for the second time. In this time, the address
+ # of syscall insn and next insn of syscall are recorded.
+
+ gdb_test "display/i \$pc" ".*"
+
+
+ # Single step until we see sysall insn or we reach the upper bound of loop
+ # iterations.
+ set see_syscall_insn 0
+
+ for {set i 0} {$i < 1000 && $see_syscall_insn == 0} {incr i} {
+ send_gdb "stepi\n"
+ gdb_expect {
+ -re ".*$syscall_insn.*$gdb_prompt $" {
+ set see_syscall_insn 1
+ }
+ -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" {}
+ }
+ }
+
+ if {$see_syscall_insn == 0} then {
+ fail "find syscall insn in $syscall"
+ return -1
+ }
+
+ set syscall_insn_addr [get_hexadecimal_valueof "\$pc" "0"]
+ gdb_test "stepi" ".*" "stepi $syscall insn"
+ set syscall_insn_next_addr [get_hexadecimal_valueof "\$pc" "0"]
+
+ gdb_test "continue" "Continuing\\..*Breakpoint \[0-9\]+, .* in $syscall ().*" \
+ "continue to $syscall (3rd time)"
+
+ # Hit the breakpoint on $syscall for the third time. In this time, we'll set
+ # breakpoint on the syscall insn we recorded previously, and single step over it.
+
+ set syscall_insn_bp 0
+ gdb_test_multiple "break \*$syscall_insn_addr" "break on syscall insn" {
+ -re "Breakpoint (\[0-9\]*) at .*$gdb_prompt $" {
+ set syscall_insn_bp $expect_out(1,string)
+ pass "break on syscall insns"
+ }
+ }
+ gdb_test_no_output "delete $syscall_bp" "delete break $syscall"
+
+ gdb_test "continue" "Continuing\\..*Breakpoint \[0-9\]+, .*" \
+ "continue to syscall insn"
+
+ gdb_test_no_output "set displaced-stepping on"
+ # Check the address of next instruction of syscall.
+ gdb_test "stepi" ".*$syscall_insn_next_addr.*" "single step over $syscall"
+
+ # Delete breakpoint syscall insns to avoid interference to other syscalls.
+ gdb_test_no_output "delete $syscall_insn_bp" "delete break $syscall insn"
+
+ gdb_test "continue" "Continuing\\..*Breakpoint \[0-9\]+, marker \\(\\) at.*" \
+ "continue to marker ($syscall)"
+}
+
+disp_step_cross_syscall "fork"
+disp_step_cross_syscall "vfork"
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/disp-step-vfork.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/disp-step-vfork.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1e705df
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/disp-step-vfork.c
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+/* This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
+
+ Copyright 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+ This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+ (at your option) any later version.
+
+ This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+ You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
+
+#include <unistd.h>
+
+int global = 0;
+
+static void
+marker () {}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+ int pid;
+
+ pid = vfork ();
+ if (pid == -1)
+ {
+ return 1;
+ }
+ else if (pid != 0)
+ {
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ global = 1;
+ _exit (0);
+ }
+
+ pid = vfork ();
+ if (pid == -1)
+ {
+ return 1;
+ }
+ else if (pid != 0)
+ {
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ global = 1;
+ _exit (0);
+ }
+
+ pid = vfork ();
+ if (pid == -1)
+ {
+ return 1;
+ }
+ else if (pid != 0)
+ {
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ global = 1;
+ _exit (0);
+ }
+
+ marker ();
+ return 0;
+
+}
--
1.7.0.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-14 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-11 9:55 Yao Qi
2011-09-12 15:03 ` Pedro Alves
2011-09-14 11:32 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2011-09-14 12:32 ` Pedro Alves
2011-09-15 15:32 ` Yao Qi
2011-09-15 16:13 ` Pedro Alves
2011-09-16 6:49 ` Yao Qi
2011-09-16 10:44 ` Pedro Alves
2011-09-17 14:35 ` [committed]: " Yao Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E708B7E.3040701@codesourcery.com \
--to=yao@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox