From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-83244-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 17694 invoked by alias); 26 Aug 2011 18:46:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 17686 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Aug 2011 18:46:21 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 18:46:07 +0000
Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7QIk7Yn005350	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 14:46:07 -0400
Received: from valrhona.uglyboxes.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7QIk4pb016634	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);	Fri, 26 Aug 2011 14:46:06 -0400
Message-ID: <4E57E9EC.8060706@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 18:46:00 -0000
From: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110816 Thunderbird/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] 12843
References: <4E56C5A0.60802@redhat.com> <m34o14t4la.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <m34o14t4la.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00504.txt.bz2

On 08/26/2011 11:22 AM, Tom Tromey wrote:

> I suspect we should tighten this further so that only drive letters work
> and not oddball stuff like "break file:/whatever.c:73".  What do you
> think?

I can play with that a little further. I'll also take the time to add a 
bunch of tests to highlight some of the problems. There is an open PR 
about this, to. In general the use of ':' or "::" in filenames is really 
bad for linespecs.

Keith