From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2521 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2011 15:43:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 2509 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Aug 2011 15:43:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (HELO mail-pz0-f44.google.com) (209.85.210.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:43:14 +0000 Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so170313pzk.3 for ; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 08:43:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.207.9 with SMTP id e9mr6759702wfg.125.1312904593825; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 08:43:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([203.110.240.178]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s3sm57768pbg.29.2011.08.09.08.43.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 09 Aug 2011 08:43:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E415691.9040703@playingwithpointers.com> Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:43:00 -0000 From: Sanjoy Das User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110626 Icedove/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] Introduce header (jit-reader.h.in) and modify build system. References: <1312903509-25132-1-git-send-email-sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com> <1312903509-25132-2-git-send-email-sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com> <83fwlazja8.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83fwlazja8.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00198.txt.bz2 Hi! > I understand that jit.c will be compiled unconditionally on the x86 > architectures, is that right? If so, would it be possible to rename > jit-header.h.in to jit-header.in, or some other name that doesn't > violate the file-naming restrictions on 8+3 (a.k.a. DOS) filesystems? > Handling such files that need to be used while compiling the DJGPP > port of GDB is a nuisance. Shouldn't be a problem, I'll correct this in the next iteration. -- Sanjoy Das http://playingwithpointers.com