From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2486 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2011 18:25:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 2475 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jul 2011 18:25:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_GD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 18:25:23 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6FIPNTF019254 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:25:23 -0400 Received: from valrhona.uglyboxes.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6FIPELB005562 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:25:20 -0400 Message-ID: <4E20860A.9020402@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 18:47:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc15 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Tromey CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [3/4] RFC: add missing quote to test References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00397.txt.bz2 On 07/15/2011 11:08 AM, Tom Tromey wrote: > Note the unpaired single quote in the test name. Yeah, that's clearly a mistake. > I don't know why this works without -gdwarf-4. I think it is a test > suite bug -- and in any case not something we want to bless by having it > in the test suite. Using the same tree? That is unexpected. Otherwise, I could pretty easily attribute this to linespec.c churn. Keith