From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31894 invoked by alias); 6 May 2011 11:15:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 31885 invoked by uid 22791); 6 May 2011 11:15:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 11:15:20 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p46BFGBZ012296 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 6 May 2011 07:15:16 -0400 Received: from dhcp-25-89.brq.redhat.com (pdp-11.brq.redhat.com [10.34.24.63]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p46BFEF2022768; Fri, 6 May 2011 07:15:15 -0400 Message-ID: <4DC3D842.2030300@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 11:15:00 -0000 From: Marek Polacek User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100827 Red Hat Thunderbird/3.1.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Muller CC: "'Jan Kratochvil'" , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] gdb.cp/static-print-quit.exp: fix racy tests (PR testsuite/12649) References: <20110506021511.GA30222@host1.jankratochvil.net> <4DC3B82D.1000505@redhat.com> <006401cc0bdd$fb42aab0$f1c80010$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> In-Reply-To: <006401cc0bdd$fb42aab0$f1c80010$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00183.txt.bz2 On 05/06/2011 01:08 PM, Pierre Muller wrote: > isn't the dollar sign a regexpr pattern meaning end of string? It is not, although I was confused for some time. It basically signs the end of the read buffer. (IIUC.) > Would it really work without -re here? I tested it without those -re and it still works without any differences. Marek