From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-80361-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 11783 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2011 16:21:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 11766 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Apr 2011 16:21:37 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-ey0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-ey0-f169.google.com) (209.85.215.169)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:21:19 +0000
Received: by eyd9 with SMTP id 9so1119008eyd.0        for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 09:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.126.65 with SMTP id a41mr1047836eei.175.1302970878334;        Sat, 16 Apr 2011 09:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (ip82-139-82-5.lijbrandt.net [82.139.82.5])        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x54sm2788729eeh.19.2011.04.16.09.21.16        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);        Sat, 16 Apr 2011 09:21:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4DA9C1FC.8040600@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:21:00 -0000
From: "Baars, M.J." <mjbaars1977.gdb@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,  gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: print_npx_status_word
References: <m3aafshl6l.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4DA7ED79.3000400@gmail.com> <m3ei53efd8.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4DA87235.7060003@gmail.com> <m3pqoncw78.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4DA87479.50203@gmail.com> <m3lizbcvt7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4DA93270.6030708@gmail.com> <201104160824.p3G8ONWV006175@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <4DA99DA1.2090708@gmail.com> <20110416142809.GA28255@caradoc.them.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110416142809.GA28255@caradoc.them.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00243.txt.bz2

On 04/16/2011 04:29 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 03:46:09PM +0200, Baars, M.J. wrote:
>> On 04/16/2011 10:24 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>>>> Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 08:08:48 +0200
>>>> From: "Baars, M.J."<mjbaars1977.gdb@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Tom,
>>>>
>>>> I believe this is the format you requested?
>>> No!  This is a .tar.gz.  Proper diffs don't come as a .tar.gz.
>> Oops... did I remove one of your entries in the ChangeLog? :)
> If you want a patch to be committed, eventually you're going to have
> to say why.  What's the goal of the patch?
When you look at the code in question more closely, you will see that it 
will present the content of the status word in more detail than the 
original function,
> Also, why on earth are you messing about with old changelog entries?
>
The old function can thus be seen as obsolete, and should be removed 
from the old log entries.

Regards,
Michael.