Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 March 2011 17:38:05, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>>> It would normally, but in this case, we've just found that
>>> the next frame is an inlined function call.  Then it
>>> certainly has debug info?  Otherwise, how would gdb know
>>> it's an inlined function call?
>> Indeed, I think you're right. inline_skipped_symbol shouldn't
>> be returning a NULL symbol, as far as I can tell.  So should
>> we just add a gdb_assert with a comment explaining why we
>> expect sym to be non-NULL?
> 
> I think so.
> 

How's this?