Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Saturday 05 March 2011 00:42:59, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> On Saturday 05 March 2011 00:37:25, Michael Snyder wrote:
>>> I think I heard someone say that gdb should be proof against all inputs?
>> Yes, but bad inputs aren't gdb bugs, so those should be errors
>> or warnings, not internal_errors.
> 
> for completeness: ... or "complaints", of which the symbol
> readers are the biggest users, exactly to complain about
> bad input debug info.  complaints have the nice property
> that they warn once, and go quiet the next time the problem
> appears --- when we see a malformed debug info problem, we
> tend to see a lot of instances of the same in the same run,
> so that feature prevents terminal flooding with a bunch of
> duplicated warnings.
> 

Thanks.  How about this?