From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27769 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2011 14:43:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 27759 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Mar 2011 14:43:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-fx0-f41.google.com) (209.85.161.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:43:13 +0000 Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so636049fxm.0 for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 06:43:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.81.77 with SMTP id w13mr8061560fak.111.1299681751330; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 06:42:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.21.0.61] ([86.125.99.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n1sm932999fam.16.2011.03.09.06.42.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 09 Mar 2011 06:42:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D7791D6.1040708@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:08:00 -0000 From: Sorin Otescu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] Add support for hooking prefix commands References: <4D776143.4000200@gmail.com> <83oc5kpivg.fsf@gnu.org> <4D777894.5040204@gmail.com> <83k4g8pg4x.fsf@gnu.org> <4D7786A1.8020806@gmail.com> <83fwqwpf0f.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83fwqwpf0f.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00603.txt.bz2 On 03/09/2011 04:03 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:54:41 +0200 >> From: Sorin Otescu >> >>> Are you saying that 7.2 already supports this feature? Or are you >>> saying that it's documented there, but doesn't work? >>> >> It's documented there, but I can't test it ATM, because I'm using a gdb >> from a toolchain and it's not >> easy for me to switch to 7.2. Maybe somebody can shed a light on the issue. > I just tried this (with "info breakpoints") in GDB 7.2, and it worked > for me. > > So I think you should upgrade when you can, and then you will have > this feature. > Thanks ! That's what you get for using obsolete software and not RTFM :)