From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5128 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2011 20:19:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 5120 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Mar 2011 20:19:54 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com) (65.115.85.69) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 20:19:50 +0000 Received: from mailhost2.vmware.com (mailhost2.vmware.com [10.16.67.167]) by smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC5C95400B; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 12:19:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com (promd-2s-dhcp138.eng.vmware.com [10.20.124.138]) by mailhost2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76FD8EE04; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 12:19:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D753DE4.2080209@vmware.com> Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 20:27:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20101201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pedro Alves CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [RFA] breakpoint.c, update_static_tracepoint, variable same name as param. References: <4D6D7881.8000304@vmware.com> <201103021612.41676.pedro@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <201103021612.41676.pedro@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00499.txt.bz2 Pedro Alves wrote: > On Tuesday 01 March 2011 22:51:45, Michael Snyder wrote: >> Note, this is just the simple-minded suggestion -- >> there might actually be a bug hidden here. >> >> Comments? > > I don't have a tree with UST support handy at the > moment, but it doesn indeed look like a bug. It > looks like the function should return the new sal. > I'll have to build ust and debug this to make sure. > Hi Pedro -- had a chance to look at this yet? Thanks, Michael