From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-79378-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 23619 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2011 20:00:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 23608 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Mar 2011 20:00:26 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com) (65.115.85.73)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 20:00:21 +0000
Received: from mailhost2.vmware.com (mailhost2.vmware.com [10.16.67.167])	by smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B5154000;	Mon,  7 Mar 2011 12:00:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com (promd-2s-dhcp138.eng.vmware.com [10.20.124.138])	by mailhost2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A6E08ED64;	Mon,  7 Mar 2011 12:00:20 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4D753953.5040601@vmware.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 20:10:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20101201)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: FYI: add TAGS target in testsuite
References: <m3vczun9qt.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <m3vczun9qt.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00491.txt.bz2

Tom Tromey wrote:
> I am checking this in.
> 
> I wanted to be able to use tags in the testsuite.  This patch adds a
> "TAGS" target to the testsuite Makefile.
> 
> I am undecided as to whether I should add this to gdb/TAGS via `etags
> --include'.  If you use etags, and have an opinion, let me know.

I use etags.  My preference would be not to.  These test files aren't
part of gdb.

> 2011-03-07  Tom Tromey  <tromey@redhat.com>
> 
> 	* Makefile.in (TAGS): New target.
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/Makefile.in b/gdb/testsuite/Makefile.in
> index c1356c5..8017ff0 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/Makefile.in
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/Makefile.in
> @@ -242,3 +242,7 @@ Makefile : Makefile.in config.status $(host_makefile_frag)
>  
>  config.status: configure
>  	$(SHELL) config.status --recheck
> +
> +TAGS: force
> +	etags --language=none --regex='/proc[ \t]+\([^ \t]+\)/\1/' \
> +	  `find $(srcdir) -name '*.exp' -print`