From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26219 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2011 05:21:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 26211 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Mar 2011 05:21:41 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 05:21:37 +0000 Received: (qmail 32265 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 05:21:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.102?) (yao@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 7 Mar 2011 05:21:35 -0000 Message-ID: <4D746B5C.6030703@codesourcery.com> Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 07:06:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: FYI: gdb/common/Makefile calling aclocal & autoconf... References: <20110306045412.GL30306@adacore.com> <201103061004.p26A476B018601@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20110307044838.GO30306@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20110307044838.GO30306@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00422.txt.bz2 On 03/07/2011 12:48 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > I think Mark are right. We are probably on the second or third "one > last push" to make things work, and we're still not done. I'm really > sorry, but we have 3 Global Maintainers (Mark, Pedro, myself) who > think that this is the wrong way to go. We tried to perservere in > this direction despite our reservations, but it's still not working. > > We've learnt a lot in the process, but I think it's time to head > in the other direction (no configure & make in common/). OK, I agree with this decision, given the other direction makes us more productive on `real code', instead of configure/make stuff. Shall I do something, for example, revert my patch, etc? -- Yao (齐尧)