From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7365 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2011 14:15:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 7354 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Mar 2011 14:15:39 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 14:15:33 +0000 Received: (qmail 14367 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2011 14:15:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.101?) (yao@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 5 Mar 2011 14:15:31 -0000 Message-ID: <4D724580.7030408@codesourcery.com> Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 14:15:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Remove make gnu-ism in gdbserver References: <4D6C9A29.3000701@codesourcery.com> <201103041702.p24H25o0014129@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> <20110305032445.GI30306@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20110305032445.GI30306@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00370.txt.bz2 On 03/05/2011 11:24 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >>> $(LIBCOMMON): $(LIBCOMMON_DIR)/Makefile >>> - @$(MAKE) $(FLAGS_TO_PASS) DO=all --directory=common >>> + @$(MAKE) $(FLAGS_TO_PASS) DO=all DODIRS=common subdir_do >> >> This breaks building gdbserver completely for me: > > Probably because Yao forgot that this patch was dependent on > one of his previous patches. I was a little surprised when Yao > said he checked it in, but I thought that maybe the other part > got approved beforehand. Let's see if we can approve the part > of the other patch that - otherwise, we'll make a temporary > revert. Sorry about that. > Sorry about breaking the build. I forget that this patch depends on the other patch which was not approved then. -- Yao (齐尧)