From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-78946-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 9893 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2011 21:56:58 -0000
Received: (qmail 9885 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Mar 2011 21:56:57 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com) (65.115.85.73)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 21:56:51 +0000
Received: from mailhost3.vmware.com (mailhost3.vmware.com [10.16.27.45])	by smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD59149009;	Tue,  1 Mar 2011 13:56:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com (promd-2s-dhcp138.eng.vmware.com [10.20.124.138])	by mailhost3.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3509CD9EE;	Tue,  1 Mar 2011 13:56:50 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4D6D6BA2.6060301@vmware.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 21:56:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20101201)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [rfa] std-regs.c, value_of_builtin_frame_pc_reg, don't bother checking for null frame.
References: <4D6D5B44.9020500@vmware.com> <201103012139.59726.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201103012152.01746.pedro@codesourcery.com>
In-Reply-To: <201103012152.01746.pedro@codesourcery.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00059.txt.bz2

Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 March 2011 21:39:59, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> On Tuesday 01 March 2011 20:47:00, Michael Snyder wrote:
>>> If frame is null, we will have crashed already from dereferencing it.
>> Yeah, looks like a left over from before the "there's always
>> a frame" changes years ago.
>>
>>> reversenull3.txt
>>>   2011-03-01  Michael Snyder  <msnyder@vmware.com>
>>>
>>>         * std-regs.c (value_of_builtin_frame_pc_reg): Frame can't be null.
>> Okay.
> 
> Similar dead code in value_of_builtin_frame_fp_reg btw.
> 

Got it.  Checked in.