From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11596 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2011 14:35:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 11476 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Feb 2011 14:35:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:35:10 +0000 Received: (qmail 4588 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2011 14:35:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.101?) (yao@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 28 Feb 2011 14:35:08 -0000 Message-ID: <4D6BB298.10206@codesourcery.com> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:54:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: question about the common/ subdir (was "Re: Ping: Merge duplicated macros in linux-nat.c and linux-low.c") References: <4D5E2021.2070107@codesourcery.com> <201102181546.26744.pedro@codesourcery.com> <4D5EA533.608@codesourcery.com> <4D612DC6.5010805@codesourcery.com> <4D6B96DC.5090606@codesourcery.com> <20110228140639.GG30306@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20110228140639.GG30306@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00892.txt.bz2 On 02/28/2011 10:06 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > Speaking of which, what was the latest decision regarding the > way we would handle the sources in common/. I thought that we > were going to delete the configury and Makefile, and treat this > the same way we treat the gnulib/ directory. Was that ever > decided? I personally would like to give this idea a try and Personally, I don't want to see that happen, :) I've given my cents here. http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-02/msg00669.html > see where it goes, but I'm not enough of an expert to really > predict whether it's going to be better or not. I can look > at producing patches, though. > -- Yao (齐尧)