From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25529 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2011 19:47:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 25521 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Feb 2011 19:47:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com) (65.115.85.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 19:47:34 +0000 Received: from mailhost3.vmware.com (mailhost3.vmware.com [10.16.27.45]) by smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED19703B; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:47:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com (promd-2s-dhcp138.eng.vmware.com [10.20.124.138]) by mailhost3.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C09CD995; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:47:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D5C29D5.2020805@vmware.com> Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 19:55:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20101201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii CC: "jan.kratochvil@redhat.com" , "pedro@codesourcery.com" , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [unavailable values part 1, 06/17] array element repeats, confused with 0. References: <201102071430.49735.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201102151828.36004.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20110216092850.GA5399@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <201102161015.19382.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20110216103302.GB22317@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <4D5C14C8.9050904@vmware.com> <83hbc3wyxs.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83hbc3wyxs.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00385.txt.bz2 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:17:44 -0800 >> From: Michael Snyder >> CC: Pedro Alves , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" >> >>>> >>> OK, it seems 80 columns is OK. >> No way. Emacs wraps at 79, so 80 is definitely *not* ok by me... > > Actually, Emacs wraps at 79 only on text-mode terminals these days. > In a GUI session, it wraps at 80. Good to know. I use a text-mode terminal.