From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4363 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2011 01:34:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 4282 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Feb 2011 01:34:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 01:34:15 +0000 Received: (qmail 11824 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2011 01:34:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.101?) (yao@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 16 Feb 2011 01:34:13 -0000 Message-ID: <4D5B2999.5010906@codesourcery.com> Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 01:54:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Kratochvil CC: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [obv] Merge gdb/common/Changelog to gdb/ChangeLog [Re: [rfa/rfc] Build libcommon.a for gdb and gdbserver] References: <4D30E23F.3080103@codesourcery.com> <4D34C9DE.3040603@codesourcery.com> <4D375F44.70504@codesourcery.com> <20110215133739.GA14877@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20110215211537.GA20962@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: <20110215211537.GA20962@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00348.txt.bz2 On 02/16/2011 05:15 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:37:39 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: >> gdb/common/ does not have its own as you created, so far its entries are contained >> in gdb/ChangeLog, it should be merged to gdb/ChangeLog. >> >> If I do not see any comment today I will check it in. > > Merged it, checked in. > > common/ dir is to contain the common files for gdb and gdbserver, so it should have its own changelog file. IMO, we may have to revert this patch, what do you think? -- Yao (齐尧)