From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4931 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2011 23:42:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 4921 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Feb 2011 23:42:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,TW_XD,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com) (65.115.85.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 23:42:44 +0000 Received: from mailhost4.vmware.com (mailhost4.vmware.com [10.16.67.124]) by smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9905417002; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:42:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com (promd-2s-dhcp138.eng.vmware.com [10.20.124.138]) by mailhost4.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE2CC9F7B; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:42:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D59BDF3.3060705@vmware.com> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 02:03:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20101201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii CC: "pedro@codesourcery.com" , "tromey@redhat.com" , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [rfa] clean up output of "info set" command. References: <4D5599E8.6030408@vmware.com> <4D55A1A4.5020208@vmware.com> <201102112333.05763.pedro@codesourcery.com> <4D55E2B7.9010607@vmware.com> <838vxlr8j2.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <838vxlr8j2.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00310.txt.bz2 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:30:31 -0800 >> From: Michael Snyder >> CC: Tom Tromey , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" >> >> - class_pseudo, class_tui, class_user, class_xdb >> + class_pseudo, class_tui, class_user, class_xdb, no_set_class >> }; > > I think it would be good to have a comment here explaining what is > no_set_class used for. Comment added, and committed.