Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: asmwarrior <asmwarrior@gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,
	tromey@redhat.com,  gdb@sourceware.org,
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Re: gdb with python support  still get crash on showing uninitialized local variables
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 02:24:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CCCD3E3.7000805@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8362wk7j5r.fsf@gnu.org>

On 3:59, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:18:20 -0400
>> From: Joel Brobecker<brobecker@adacore.com>
>> Cc: Tom Tromey<tromey@redhat.com>, asmwarrior@gmail.com,	gdb@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>>
>> Yes, because it's a script, the makefile should execute it via $SHELL.
>> I see that we're making the same error in gdb/doc, for instance, so
>> it looks like we would be unable to build the documentation if building
>> using MinGW tools.
>
> If you are using the MinGW port of GNU Make, it will always use sh.exe
> (if it can find it on your PATH) automatically to run any shell
> scripts invoked by the Makefile.  I just tried that with a MinGW build
> of Make 3.82, and commands like "./mkinstalldirs foo/bar" just work (I
> do have a sh.exe).  This works because the function process_begin on
> w32/subproc/sub_proc.c has code to detect a Unix shell script and
> DTRT.
>
> So there's some other factor at work here.  Or maybe the sh.exe which
> is installed on the OP's machine has some issues that mine doesn't.
Hi Eli
I use the configure make command directly in the MSYS shell. So I think 
they by default use the GNU make (not the mingw32-make).

But I run the make -v on the MSYS shell, it gives the version number 
3.81. So I will try 3.82 as your mentioned.

Asmwarrior


  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-31  2:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4CB66700.3000907@gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <m3tykn2id8.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
2010-10-19 20:17   ` RFA: add python exception subclasses (Was: gdb with python support still get crash on showing uninitialized local variables) Tom Tromey
2010-10-19 21:13     ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-10-20  5:19     ` gdb with python support still get crash on showing uninitialized local variables asmwarrior
2010-10-22 19:13       ` Tom Tromey
2010-10-22 21:22         ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-10-29 19:18           ` Joel Brobecker
2010-10-29 22:01             ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-10-31  2:24               ` asmwarrior [this message]
2010-11-12 20:47     ` RFA: add python exception subclasses Tom Tromey
     [not found]     ` <AANLkTinsJLTZT0ws=LbpYcq85_Z9_R=fcXz+J+kqScJU@mail.gmail.com>
2010-12-17 19:04       ` Tom Tromey
2010-12-18  2:26         ` asmwarrior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CCCD3E3.7000805@gmail.com \
    --to=asmwarrior@gmail.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tromey@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox