From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19119 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2010 00:17:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 19110 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Oct 2010 00:17:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:17:37 +0000 Received: (qmail 18944 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2010 00:17:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.106?) (jie@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 21 Oct 2010 00:17:36 -0000 Message-ID: <4CBF86A6.8020102@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:17:00 -0000 From: Jie Zhang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100918 Icedove/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pedro Alves CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Doug Evans Subject: Re: Fix Makefile.in in data-directory References: <4CBEDBF5.9060504@codesourcery.com> <4CBF84E6.6020100@codesourcery.com> <201010210114.24465.pedro@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <201010210114.24465.pedro@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg00328.txt.bz2 On 10/21/2010 08:14 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On Thursday 21 October 2010 01:10:14, Jie Zhang wrote: >> I don't think this is an issue. I think in the last more than 10 years, >> no one did "make -j all install" since the same instance in >> gdb/Makefile.in has been there since it was created. Actually if you do >> that in current gdb, it will not install gdb at all. I usually issue >> >> make -j4 all >> make install > > FWIW, I got surprised before learning that "make -j4 install" misbehaves > like that. I'd rather have it fixed. It just sounds like a buglet people > got used to dealing with. > I didn't mean that "make -j4 install" misbehaves for gdb. It's "make -j4 all install" that misbehaves. -- Jie Zhang CodeSourcery