From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12059 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2010 18:52:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 12049 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Oct 2010 18:52:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:52:29 +0000 Received: (qmail 32605 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2010 18:52:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO macbook-2.local) (stan@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 8 Oct 2010 18:52:27 -0000 Message-ID: <4CAF6865.1060409@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:52:00 -0000 From: Stan Shebs User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Stan Shebs , Pedro Alves Subject: Re: [RFA] Quiet a tracepoint notification with gdbserver References: <20101008174145.GP23776@caradoc.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20101008174145.GP23776@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg00150.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Since gdbserver now defines trace_timestamp, we get a notice after > connection. This is confusing if you're not trying to use > tracepoints. I suggest the attached patch; OK? > > It's OK with me. I think what we really want is some kind of "I'm a tracepoint user" hint or heuristic that activates this class of warning, but we don't yet have enough user feedback to know how much effort we need to make. Stan