From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10145 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2010 12:18:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 10060 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Sep 2010 12:18:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_DL,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:18:32 +0000 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8ACIGxx024529 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:18:16 -0400 Received: from [10.36.9.46] (vpn2-9-46.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.9.46]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8ACIE8S027596; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:18:15 -0400 Message-ID: <4C8A2206.4050506@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:47:00 -0000 From: Nick Clifton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100907 Fedora/3.0.7-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Muller CC: "'Andreas Schwab'" , binutils@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix gdb compilation error in opcodes/dlx-dis.c with --enable-targets=all for mingw64 References: <2531.82755918733$1284046069@news.gmane.org> <004001cb503c$9879a580$c96cf080$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> In-Reply-To: <004001cb503c$9879a580$c96cf080$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-09/txt/msg00215.txt.bz2 Hi Pierre, > 2010-09-09 Pierre Muller > > * src/opcodes/dlx-dis.c (print_insn_dlx): Use dlx_insn type for > dlx_insn_type array. Approved - please apply. Cheers Nick > - switch (((dlx_insn) (dlx_insn_type[insn_idx])) (info)) > + switch (((dlx_insn_type[insn_idx])) (info)) You appear to have an unnecessary set of parentheses here... Cheers Nick