Re: [PATCH,ARM] Fix single step on vfork

Pedro Alves
2010-09-06T11:57:29Z

On Thursday 02 September 2010 02:03:53, Yao Qi wrote:
> Pedro Alves wrote:
> > On Wednesday 01 September 2010 17:56:32, Yao Qi wrote:
> >> + /* Don't consider single-stepping when the inferior is
> >> + waiting_for_vfork_done, either software or hardware step. In
> >> + software step, child process will hit the software single step
> >> + breakpoint inserted in parent process. In hardware step, GDB
> >> + can resumes inferior, and waiting for vfork_done event. */
> >
> > This last sentence looks incomplete? At least, I can't seem to
> > parse it.
> >
> I replaced "waiting" by "wait" in the new patch.

Thanks. Please go ahead with your patch. Hope you don't mind I tweak
the comment a bit afterwards.

--
Pedro Alves