From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21474 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2010 13:16:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 21342 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Aug 2010 13:16:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:16:24 +0000 Received: from int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.17]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7BDG5ew015932 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:16:05 -0400 Received: from Phil-THINK.home (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7BDG2Pg021340; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:16:03 -0400 Message-ID: <4C62A292.6030702@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:16:00 -0000 From: Phil Muldoon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100720 Fedora/3.1.1-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb-patches ml CC: Tom Tromey , Joel Brobecker , Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [patch] Add solib_address and decode_line Python functionality References: <4C44728D.4040408@redhat.com> <20100727162545.GF13267@adacore.com> <4C5015E2.4000205@redhat.com> <4C5C1418.7030607@redhat.com> <4C613540.9090009@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00142.txt.bz2 On 10/08/10 19:24, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Phil" == Phil Muldoon writes: > Eli> This is okay, but I would suggest to explain what happens without the > Eli> argument first. Readers shouldn't need to read all the description of > Eli> how the argument is parsed if they don't want to pass it. > > Phil> > I've used your re-ordering in this patch, too. > > Eli> I'm happy now. Thanks. > > Tom> So, could you make this conditional? > > Phil> Sure, what do you think of the attached patch? > > Tom> Thanks for persevering. This is ok. So committed. Thanks http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2010-08/msg00051.html Cheers, Phil