From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26870 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2010 16:26:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 26854 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jul 2010 16:26:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com) (65.115.85.69) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 16:26:12 +0000 Received: from mailhost3.vmware.com (mailhost3.vmware.com [10.16.27.45]) by smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 098529; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 09:26:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com (promd-2s-dhcp138.eng.vmware.com [10.20.124.138]) by mailhost3.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31BFCD94C; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 09:26:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C2CC1A0.50502@vmware.com> Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 16:26:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090609) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pedro Alves CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: el vs ell (Re: Static tracepoints support) References: <201006251931.57860.pedro@codesourcery.com> <83tyoqcc8i.fsf@gnu.org> <201006281326.39820.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201007011449.54153.pedro@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <201007011449.54153.pedro@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg00015.txt.bz2 Pedro Alves wrote: > On Monday 28 June 2010 13:26:38, Pedro Alves wrote: >>>> +query), until the target responds with @samp{l} (lower-case el, for >>>> +@dfn{last}). ^^ >>> "ell" >> Thanks. This was copied from elsewhere. I'll audit those as well >> after this is in. >> > > As promised.. There is only one other instance of "el" or "ell" in > the manuals or sources I could find (cd gdb; egrep " el(l)?(,|\.| )" * -rn), > and it was the one I copied from. I was going to fix it, but, I noticed > that says: > > "L is the twelfth letter of the basic modern Latin alphabet. Its name in > English (play /ˈɛl/) is spelled el or occasionally ell.[1]" > > So, which one should we use? Is this an American English vs other > flavours issue? > You could just say "lower-case 'L'"...