From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-73946-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 7473 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2010 17:58:08 -0000
Received: (qmail 7454 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jun 2010 17:58:07 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com) (65.115.85.73)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:58:02 +0000
Received: from mailhost4.vmware.com (mailhost4.vmware.com [10.16.67.124])	by smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF8236019;	Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com (promd-2s-dhcp138.eng.vmware.com [10.20.124.138])	by mailhost4.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8212EC9A0C;	Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C239CA9.1060909@vmware.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:58:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090609)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
CC: Pierre Muller <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>,  "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: New ARI warning Wed Jun 23 01:54:57 UTC 2010
References: <20100623015457.GA20656@sourceware.org> <20100624145616.GA31306@caradoc.them.org> <002501cb13af$e723d1c0$b56b7540$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <20100624151512.GX8410@caradoc.them.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100624151512.GX8410@caradoc.them.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg00539.txt.bz2

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 05:14:12PM +0200, Pierre Muller wrote:
>>   I don't really know the origin of this rule,
>> but if you look up the sources, you will see that 'read_memory' 
>> is defined in gdbcore.h
>>
>>   So this function should be specific for core management, no?
> 
> I don't see why... if it is, it should be renamed.
> 

read_memory is widely used in other parts of gdb.