Pedro Alves wrote:

> To be a bit clearer --
> 
>  you've said that the pid was left as 42000 (I assume you meant
> inferior_ptid, but that find_inferior no longer finds that inferior.
> Where is the current inferior getting it's pid cleared out?  Why
> aren't we clearing inferior_ptid as well?


OK, right.

remote_close calls discard_all_inferiors -- it should also
set inferior_ptid to null_ptid at the same time.

How's this patch?