From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21240 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2010 21:55:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 21228 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Jun 2010 21:55:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com) (65.115.85.69) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 21:55:50 +0000 Received: from jupiter.vmware.com (mailhost5.vmware.com [10.16.68.131]) by smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A8B1303F; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 14:55:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com (promd-2s-dhcp138.eng.vmware.com [10.20.124.138]) by jupiter.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15CFADC424; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 14:55:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C06D364.6030009@vmware.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 21:55:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090609) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pedro Alves CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , Joel Brobecker Subject: Re: [RFA] gdb.trace, use gdb_test_no_output References: <4C06BE41.5010505@vmware.com> <20100602214142.GB3019@adacore.com> <201006022254.12313.pedro@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <201006022254.12313.pedro@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg00073.txt.bz2 Pedro Alves wrote: > On Wednesday 02 June 2010 22:41:42, Joel Brobecker wrote: >>> 2010-06-02 Michael Snyder >>> >>> * gdb.trace/actions.exp: Use gdb_test_no_output. >>> * gdb.trace/circ.exp: Ditto. >>> * gdb.trace/packetlen.exp: Ditto. >>> * gdb.trace/save-trace.exp: Ditto. >>> * gdb.trace/tracecmd.exp: Ditto. >>> * gdb.trace/tsv.exp: Ditto. >> This looks fine, but I'm going to defer to Pedro or Stan, who know >> tracepoints better than I do. > > Looks fine to me too. Thanks. > Done. Thanks for the review.