From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-73379-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 28686 invoked by alias); 27 May 2010 23:25:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 28676 invoked by uid 22791); 27 May 2010 23:25:06 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com) (65.115.85.69)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 May 2010 23:25:01 +0000
Received: from jupiter.vmware.com (mailhost5.vmware.com [10.16.68.131])	by smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D1C5B000;	Thu, 27 May 2010 16:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com (promd-2s-dhcp138.eng.vmware.com [10.20.124.138])	by jupiter.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA59BDC1BE;	Thu, 27 May 2010 16:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4BFEFF4B.3010906@vmware.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 00:18:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090609)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,  Stan Shebs <stan@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] gdb.trace/*.exp send_gdb vs. gdb_test
References: <4BFEB77D.4080107@vmware.com> <4BFEC338.6090307@vmware.com> <201005272350.40581.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201005280015.41580.pedro@codesourcery.com>
In-Reply-To: <201005280015.41580.pedro@codesourcery.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg00672.txt.bz2

Pedro Alves wrote:

> ... the test is using an undocumented packet to set
> artificial limits on the remote tracing engine.  GDBserver doesn't
> implement that packet.  I had never heard of this packet, and I'm
> not sure it makes much sense to have this test nowadays.  Can we
> just get rid of the whole test file?


OK with me, but probably not my decision...