From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-73357-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 31701 invoked by alias); 27 May 2010 19:08:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 31692 invoked by uid 22791); 27 May 2010 19:08:49 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com) (65.115.85.69)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 May 2010 19:08:42 +0000
Received: from jupiter.vmware.com (mailhost5.vmware.com [10.16.68.131])	by smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C6942005;	Thu, 27 May 2010 12:08:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com (promd-2s-dhcp138.eng.vmware.com [10.20.124.138])	by jupiter.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED8E9DC14B;	Thu, 27 May 2010 12:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4BFEC338.6090307@vmware.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 19:14:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090609)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,  Stan Shebs <stan@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] gdb.trace/*.exp send_gdb vs. gdb_test
References: <4BFEB77D.4080107@vmware.com> <201005271922.03831.pedro@codesourcery.com>
In-Reply-To: <201005271922.03831.pedro@codesourcery.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg00650.txt.bz2

Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Thursday 27 May 2010 19:18:37, Michael Snyder wrote:
>> This patch should get extra-thorough review and preferably be tested by
>> the tracepoint maintainers, since I wasn't able to test all of it.
> 
> Did you test it against gdbserver x86 or x86_64?  That should cover it:
> 
>  <http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/TestingGDB#Testing_gdbserver_in_a_native_configuration>

OK thanks.  They all work except for limits.exp, which does not run
because it tests "tstatus" before it executes "target remote".