From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-73164-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 3170 invoked by alias); 20 May 2010 22:02:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 3131 invoked by uid 22791); 20 May 2010 22:02:31 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com) (65.115.85.69)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 May 2010 22:02:26 +0000
Received: from jupiter.vmware.com (mailhost5.vmware.com [10.16.68.131])	by smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79DA913064;	Thu, 20 May 2010 15:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com (promd-2s-dhcp138.eng.vmware.com [10.20.124.138])	by jupiter.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72871DC051;	Thu, 20 May 2010 15:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4BF5B171.1000209@vmware.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 22:07:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090609)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [resubmit] gdb.base, r*.exp thru w*.exp
References: <4BF59BBB.8020603@vmware.com> <20100520211446.GA8299@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <4BF5ABAD.8030403@vmware.com> <20100520214614.GA11229@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <4BF5AE60.1080500@vmware.com> <20100520215658.GA11720@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
In-Reply-To: <20100520215658.GA11720@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg00457.txt.bz2

Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Thu, 20 May 2010 23:49:20 +0200, Michael Snyder wrote:
>> You have to assume that we don't care about anything between
>> the ".*" and the "$gdb_prompt $".  If we do, the test is wrong,
> 
> It cannot be perfect but ".*\r\n$gdb_prompt $" still works while it has less
> false positives than ".*$gdb_prompt $".
> 
> OTOH this change was not a goal of your patch so it can be provided as
> a different patch.

Yeah, I don't volunteer to do that.  ;-)
There would be tens of thousands of instances, I think.