From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-73067-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 12715 invoked by alias); 17 May 2010 17:34:08 -0000
Received: (qmail 12685 invoked by uid 22791); 17 May 2010 17:34:06 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com) (65.115.85.73)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 May 2010 17:34:03 +0000
Received: from mailhost4.vmware.com (mailhost4.vmware.com [10.16.67.124])	by smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FAD29007;	Mon, 17 May 2010 10:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com (promd-2s-dhcp138.eng.vmware.com [10.20.124.138])	by mailhost4.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6CBC9F44;	Mon, 17 May 2010 10:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4BF17E09.3010303@vmware.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 17:34:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090609)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
CC: Pierre Muller <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>,  "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] persistence of schedlock mode
References: <4BEAEEB0.5040202@vmware.com> <000c01caf598$50754fe0$f15fefa0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <20100517131955.GD2805@adacore.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100517131955.GD2805@adacore.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg00360.txt.bz2

Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> I really have the impression that this
>> patch went in by error in a long series of patches 
>> from Michael all labeled with '[ob]... white space'
>> without the patch itself being approved on the main thread. 
> 
> Now sure how or why it got there, but I wanted to confirm that
> all patches got reverted by Pedro (thanks Pedro!).
> 

Sorry, this was an accident.
Thanks Pedro for reverting it.
Michael