From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32285 invoked by alias); 7 May 2010 18:51:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 32276 invoked by uid 22791); 7 May 2010 18:51:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com) (65.115.85.69) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 May 2010 18:51:24 +0000 Received: from mailhost2.vmware.com (mailhost2.vmware.com [10.16.67.167]) by smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74627C004; Fri, 7 May 2010 11:51:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com (promd-2s-dhcp138.eng.vmware.com [10.20.124.138]) by mailhost2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AE1B8E9A1; Fri, 7 May 2010 11:51:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BE4612B.2080201@vmware.com> Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 18:51:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090609) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "tromey@redhat.com" CC: Pedro Alves , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [ob] remote.c, eliminate unused variables References: <4BE1D93F.8000309@vmware.com> <201005052151.19745.pedro@codesourcery.com> <4BE1DFA9.9060607@vmware.com> <201005052241.14753.pedro@codesourcery.com> <4BE1EF9C.8070807@vmware.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg00198.txt.bz2 Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Snyder writes: > > Michael> No, I'm attempting to make the code easier to understand by > Michael> removing dead code and variables. Since this warning is > Michael> turned off, I'm not even reducing the number of warnings. > > Are you planning to enable them? I hope so, since otherwise this work > will quickly regress. I was, but there have been a handful of cases that I could not eliminate so far. > > FWIW I read through all the patches and sent comments about the changes > I saw that seemed fishy. Thanks, the review is much appreciated.