From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25144 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2010 17:52:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 25133 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Apr 2010 17:52:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com) (65.115.85.69) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:51:58 +0000 Received: from mailhost3.vmware.com (mailhost3.vmware.com [10.16.27.45]) by smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D7411305F; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:51:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com (promd-2s-dhcp138.eng.vmware.com [10.20.124.138]) by mailhost3.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30C78CD9BB; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:51:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BC7523B.6010708@vmware.com> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:52:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090609) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pedro Alves CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , "tromey@redhat.com" Subject: Re: PR8554: New command to save breakpoints to a file References: <201004090341.14389.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201004091823.31659.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201004121914.44401.pedro@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <201004121914.44401.pedro@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00472.txt.bz2 Pedro Alves wrote: > On Friday 09 April 2010 18:23:31, Pedro Alves wrote: >> On Friday 09 April 2010 17:17:31, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: >>> Pedro> (I finished this instead of dumping it.) >>> >>> Thanks. I do like this approach. >>> >>> Pedro> Add a new save-breakpoints command to save breakpoint definitions >>> Pedro> to a file. >>> >>> I'd personally prefer "save breakpoints", with a space, and make >>> save-tracepoints a deprecated alias for "save tracepoints". What do you >>> (and others) think of this? I tend to like simple commands with spaces, >>> especially when a subcommand comes along. >> Fine with me. > > Done now. What about watchpoints? Do we get all the context info right?