From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4796 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2010 17:20:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 4783 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Apr 2010 17:20:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com) (65.115.85.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:20:45 +0000 Received: from mailhost4.vmware.com (mailhost4.vmware.com [10.16.67.124]) by smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5867B3D010; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:20:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com (promd-2s-dhcp138.eng.vmware.com [10.20.124.138]) by mailhost4.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48697C9A54; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:20:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BC5F969.6010606@vmware.com> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:20:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090609) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: Chris Moller , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: A patch I'd like to propose. References: <4BC5AE1A.8050900@redhat.com> <20100414170505.GM19194@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20100414170505.GM19194@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00454.txt.bz2 Joel Brobecker wrote: >> Adds the command "quickquit," aliased to "qq," to cli/cli-cmds.c. >> It eliminates that annoying quit_confirm() when quitting gdb. > > I like the idea of being able to quit without having to confirm. > Either a new command, or using a switch? We seem to be using command > switches more and more, lately. I assume we want to make this > sufficiently more convienient than typing y-ENTER, so maybe "qq" > is the way to go... > I don't suppose "q!".... just kidding! ;-)