From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9453 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2010 23:18:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 9445 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Apr 2010 23:18:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:18:14 +0000 Received: (qmail 27124 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 23:18:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO macbook-2.local) (stan@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 8 Apr 2010 23:18:13 -0000 Message-ID: <4BBE642F.6020500@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:18:00 -0000 From: Stan Shebs User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tromey@redhat.com CC: Stan Shebs , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Include value of default-collect in breakpoint/tracepoint list References: <4BBA7264.5060109@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00209.txt.bz2 Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Stan" == Stan Shebs writes: >>>>>> > > Stan> 2010-04-05 Stan Shebs > Stan> * breakpoint.c (default_collect_info): New function. > Stan> (breakpoints_info): Call it. > Stan> (maintenance_info_breakpoints): Ditto. > Stan> (tracepoints_info): Ditto. > > > Also, I think the preferred style nowadays is to order functions so that > we don't need forward declarations (when possible). > I really hate that style, it's just as evil as top-posting. :-) But as you say, it's now the fashion, so I committed it that way. Stan