From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4393 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2010 17:48:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 4383 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Mar 2010 17:48:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:47:57 +0000 Received: (qmail 10509 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2010 17:47:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO macbook-2.local) (stan@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 15 Mar 2010 17:47:55 -0000 Message-ID: <4B9E72C5.60303@codesourcery.com> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:48:00 -0000 From: Stan Shebs User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vladimir Prus CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [MI tracepoints 2/9] unify breakpoint commands and tracepoint actions References: <201003141147.34051.vladimir@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <201003141147.34051.vladimir@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00548.txt.bz2 Vladimir Prus wrote: > There's a lot of similarity, conceptual and code-wise, between breakpoint > commands and tracepoint actions. This patch unifies both. OK? > This deserves a NEWS entry, in fact the new MI commands should have a (separate) NEWS entry as well. Also, did I miss the changes to the manual? I'm not seeing them here or in patch 9/9. OK with those additions. Tom, is this going to interfere with your multiple-breakpoints commands patch? Should we do any coordination on that? Stan