From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15482 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2010 18:39:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 15472 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Mar 2010 18:39:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:39:19 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o24IdHND004657 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 13:39:17 -0500 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o24IdFjK016438 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 13:39:17 -0500 Message-ID: <4B8FFE52.1010807@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:39:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100120 Fedora/3.0.1-1.fc11 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] More linespec quoting "fixes" References: <4B85A3BF.8010001@redhat.com> <4B8EA3B5.6080504@redhat.com> <20100304135108.GC23708@caradoc.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20100304135108.GC23708@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00204.txt.bz2 On 03/04/2010 05:51 AM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Sounds good to me. There's no use worrying too much about the future > rewrite; we don't know what the code accepts today, let alone what it > will in the future. Committed. My thanks to Tom and Daniel for reviewing this. Keith