From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-70170-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 22094 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2010 21:39:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 22084 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Feb 2010 21:39:41 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com) (65.115.85.73)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 21:39:37 +0000
Received: from jupiter.vmware.com (mailhost5.vmware.com [10.16.68.131]) 	by smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E0D32065; 	Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:39:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.20.124.101] (promd-2s-dhcp101.eng.vmware.com [10.20.124.101]) 	by jupiter.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA9EDC6D8; 	Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:39:35 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B75CA94.8010302@vmware.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 21:39:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090609)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
CC: "gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com" <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: GDB MI Reverse Commands added [3 of 3]
References: <00d001ca265a$ddd0c800$99725800$@com> <4B27E619.8080607@vmware.com> <200912161106.12861.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <010001ca7e2c$7ce406e0$76ac14a0$@com> <hgab3r$fq1$2@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <hgab3r$fq1$2@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00329.txt.bz2

Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Jakob Engblom wrote:
> 
>>> It does not seem like any of them were addressed. When they are addressed,
>>> this patch is OK. Because the only non-mechanical change is replacement of
>>> FIXME with a suitable comment, and reverse-mode experts are in much better
>>> position to decide if a comment captures the behaviour properly, I don't
>>> think I have to re-review any revision of this patch -- please commit directly
>>> when you think it's ready.
>> I think they are. The latest file that Michael Snyder attached:
>>
>> * Is called "mi-reverse.exp"
> 
> Per Michael's last message, it seems that he just attached wrong file
> when pinging, and this issue is now resolved.

Committed.