From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2117 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2010 19:12:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 2106 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jan 2010 19:12:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:12:32 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0RJCVcx014241 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:12:31 -0500 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0RJCQ7S027666 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:12:30 -0500 Message-ID: <4B609019.1090807@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:12:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091209 Fedora/3.0-3.fc11 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA 2/4] dwarf2_physname References: <4B0707E7.5010308@uglyboxes.com> <20091120220927.GA9589@caradoc.them.org> <4B1EAD5C.6060708@redhat.com> <4B2692EE.5090807@redhat.com> <20091217202843.GA11961@caradoc.them.org> <20091222192444.GB15339@caradoc.them.org> <4B576983.2090808@redhat.com> <20100126211733.GA17877@caradoc.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20100126211733.GA17877@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00595.txt.bz2 On 01/26/2010 01:17 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > I think that this means we should move on past the speed concern for > now, and focus on any other issues in the patch. Where were we on > that front? I've merged with CVS HEAD again, but I see some regressions lying about. I believe we've mentioned (and perhaps discussed) a few of these before. Some involve fixing the test suite; some are java regressions (which I working to fix now -- I *think* I may be getting close). Let me grab Sami's last commit, re-run and see where we stand. Keith