Re: [RFA 2/4] dwarf2_physname

[Sami Wagiaalla <swagiaal@redhat.com>]

On 11/24/2009 02:21 PM, Sami Wagiaalla wrote:
> On 11/23/2009 12:07 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:51:16AM -0800, Keith Seitz wrote:
>>> On 11/20/2009 02:09 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am generally opposed to committing known regressions. If there are
>>>> supporting patches we need to get in first, let's do that; if there
>>>> are tests we decide to break, let's XFAIL or KFAIL them. That's the
>>>> only way we can make the testsuite more useful.
>>>
>>> Sami has a follow-on patch that he could submit to fix all of these
>>> tests (they all pass on archer-keiths-expr-cumulative). Perhaps it
>>> would be acceptable for Sami to submit that patchset when/if this
>>> patch is accepted? [His patches rely on this patchset.]
>>
>> If it applies on top of this, could he post it now? Then we can treat
>> them as a unit for review and testing purposes.
>>
>
> I looked into this. It turns out that this is fixed by the patches
> posted on the thread rooted at this message
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-07/msg00305.html
>

These patches have been approved and committed.

Sami