From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7184 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2010 21:24:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 7156 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jan 2010 21:24:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:24:51 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0ELOlem006036 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:24:47 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0ELOjk1004037; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:24:46 -0500 Message-ID: <4B4F8B9D.4080806@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:24:00 -0000 From: Phil Muldoon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091209 Fedora/3.0-4.fc12 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tromey@redhat.com CC: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches ml Subject: Re: [patch][python] Implement Python lazy strings (PR 10705) References: <4B4746A7.90309@redhat.com> <4B4DDD7B.5080204@redhat.com> <4B4E2BBF.6050407@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00391.txt.bz2 On 01/13/2010 08:33 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Phil" == Phil Muldoon writes: > > Phil> On 01/13/2010 06:13 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > Phil> Here is an updated patch. What do you think? > > Tom> A couple more notes. > > Phil> Oops, those gotchas should be fixed now. Appending patch. > > Thanks! This is ok. > > Tom Thanks -- I have checked this into CVS: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2010-01/msg00116.html