Hi all, Hope this does a better job then. I also removed the typo's from the comments. Mark Kettenis wrote: >> Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 09:32:13 +0400 >> From: Joel Brobecker >> >> Michael, >> >> I changed the subject to something meaningful; you have a *much* higher >> chance of attracting the eye of the appropriate maintainer if you use >> descriptive subjects. >> > > Yup. I didn't notice it. So either I didn't receive the origional > mail or I deleted it immediately based on the subject. Can you send > the diff again? > > >> I will let Mark tell you whether he likes your change of output or not. >> Personally, I liked the previous output better - much more compact >> and easier to read, there are too many decorations in your proposed >> output and it's harder to isolate the relevant information. >> > > If you send your diff again, can you include an example of how the > output looks? I must warn you that I'm likely to agree with Joel here > though. > > New output looks like: Does not display correctly in the previous email, you should check it for yourself I suppose. Regards, Michael