Hi all,

Hope this does a better job then.

Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 09:32:13 +0400
>> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
>>
>> Michael,
>>
>> I changed the subject to something meaningful; you have a *much* higher
>> chance of attracting the eye of the appropriate maintainer if you use
>> descriptive subjects.
>>     
>
> Yup.  I didn't notice it.  So either I didn't receive the origional
> mail or I deleted it immediately based on the subject.  Can you send
> the diff again?
>
>   
>> I will let Mark tell you whether he likes your change of output or not.
>> Personally, I liked the previous output better - much more compact
>> and easier to read, there are too many decorations in your proposed
>> output and it's harder to isolate the relevant information.
>>     
>
> If you send your diff again, can you include an example of how the
> output looks?  I must warn you that I'm likely to agree with Joel here
> though.
>
>   
New output looks like:

Temporary breakpoint 1, main () at ./main.c:6
6        double x = rand();
(gdb) info float
  R7: Empty   0x00000000000000000000
  R6: Empty   0x00000000000000000000
  R5: Empty   0x00000000000000000000
  R4: Empty   0x00000000000000000000
  R3: Empty   0x00000000000000000000
  R2: Empty   0x00000000000000000000
  R1: Empty   0x00000000000000000000
=>R0: Empty   0x00000000000000000000

status word              : 0x0000
  exception flags        :                  
  stack fault            :  
  error summary status   :  
  condition code         :            
  top of stack (TOP)     : 0
control word             : 0x037f
  exception masks        : PM UM OM ZM DM IM
  precision control (PC) : 64-bits (extended precision)
  rounding control (RC)  : round to nearest or even
Tag Word:            0xffff
Instruction Pointer: 0x00:0x00000000
Operand Pointer:     0x00:0x00000000
Opcode:              0x0000


Regards,
Michael