From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24032 invoked by alias); 24 Dec 2009 18:24:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 24022 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Dec 2009 18:24:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Dec 2009 18:24:03 +0000 Received: (qmail 13263 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2009 18:24:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO macbook-2.local) (stan@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 24 Dec 2009 18:24:01 -0000 Message-ID: <4B33B1BB.6010408@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 18:24:00 -0000 From: Stan Shebs User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pedro Alves CC: Stan Shebs , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handle OP_THIS in tracepoints References: <4B32C4ED.6050904@codesourcery.com> <200912241634.55084.pedro@codesourcery.com> <4B33AB93.4070807@codesourcery.com> <200912241808.02200.pedro@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <200912241808.02200.pedro@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00387.txt.bz2 Pedro Alves wrote: > On Thursday 24 December 2009 17:57:39, Stan Shebs wrote: > >> Pedro Alves wrote: >> >>> This is busted, and was later fixed in our internal >>> tree. :-) The selected frame, and the current language >>> don't have anything to do with the context in which >>> the tracepoint runs. E.g.: >>> >>> >> Darn, I forgot about that one. >> >> Oh, but wait a minute! Issue #6302 says "submission required", and it's >> assigned to... you! And now that the base code is in, >> > > Eh, oops, I didn't realize from your post that the > patch was applied already. > If truth be known, my semi-sorted patch pile is missing the most recent changes, otherwise I would have simply folded yours in. No value in sending in every one of our 150-odd local tracepoint changes individually. Stan